Ziel dieses Kurses ist es, eine grundlegende Einführung in die verhaltensorientierte Verwaltungswissenschaft zu geben und die Studierenden zu befähigen, diesen Erklärungsansatz auf aktuelle Problem- und Fragestellungen der öffentlichen Verwaltung und insbesondere der Arbeits- und Sozialverwaltung in Deutschland anzuwenden. Die verhaltensorientierte Verwaltungswissenschaft ist ein innovatives Forschungsfeld innerhalb der Verwaltungswissenschaft, das verhaltenswissenschaftliche Erkenntnisse zur Untersuchung des Verwaltungshandelns nutzt (eng. Behavioral Public Administration). Der Kurs gliedert sich in zwei Teile: Der erste Teil bietet eine Einführung in die grundlegenden Theorien bürokratischen Verhaltens. Dazu werden die Studierenden mit den Grundannahmen und wichtigsten Erkenntnissen der verschiedenen Mikrofundierungen administrativen Handelns vertraut gemacht. Im zweiten Teil des Kurses werden exemplarische Themen wie Leistungsmessung, Öffentlichkeit, Arbeitsmotivation, Koproduktion, Servicezufriedenheit, Serviceversagen, Diskriminierung und repräsentative Bürokratie aus der Perspektive der verhaltensorientierten Verwaltungswissenschaft analysiert, um die empirische Gültigkeit dieses Erklärungsrahmens zu überprüfen.

Literatur

Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Jilke, S., Olsen, A.L. and Tummers, L. (2017). Behavioral Public Administration: Combining Insights from Public Administration and Psychology. Public Administration Review, 77: 45-56.

Jankowski, M., Prokop, C. and Tepe, M. (2020). Representative Bureaucracy and Public Hiring Preferences. Evidence from a Conjoint Experiment among German Municipal Civil Servants and Private Sector Employees. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 30(4): 596–618.

James, O., Jilke, S., & Van Ryzin, G. (Eds.). (2017). Experiments in Public Management Research: Challenges and Contributions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wise, L. R. (2004). Bureaucratic Posture: On the Need for a Composite Theory of Bureaucratic Behavior. Public Administration Review, 64(6), 669–680.

Prüfungsleistungen und CP

6 CP: Diskussionsleitung (10 Min.), Präsentation eines Studiendesigns (10 Min.) und schriftliche Ausarbeitung des Studiendesigns in Form einer Pre-Registration/eines Pre-Analyseplans.

In a first step, we discuss different texts on the variety of capitalist development in relation to welfare state development.
The second step is to highlight challenges of welfare capitalism as we know it.
Finally, we discuss some concepts on how to develop welfare state capitalism in the future.

preparatory literature:
Literature will be provided in Stud.IP

(CP) credits and exams:
You can achieve both 3 CP and 6 CP for the Master in Social Policy.
The seminar will be held as a block seminar on Fridays.

Distributive politics characterize income redistribution and the allocation of public goods and services (e. g. health care, education, social security, but also particularistic goods) to individuals or groups and are based on taxes and transfers. Wealth and resources are unequally distributed in society. The question that distributive politics consequently address asks: who gets what, who benefits – who loses? Distributive politics illustrate the very heart of politics and a vibrant field of research which just gained new momentum in the last years. We will study principles of resource allocation from political actors (parties) to individuals (voters), considering the electoral payoff for political parties and voters. Which groups are targeted by political parties with public goods provision: core or swing voters, the rich or the poor, the median voter or particular groups (clients), the winning coalition or the selectorate? Do voters respond to non-programmatic inducements such as vote buying? When does income inequality lead to upheaval and regime change? We will start with the discussion of classical concepts and theories in comparative political economy before we move towards the analysis of current issues in this field of research in the course of the seminar.
Distributive politics refer to two central aspects in the political sphere: 1) political accountability and 2) political responsiveness. The first aspect studies how far voters are able to hold political actors accountable for their actions and, thus, takes into account the political consequences of distributive politics (e. g. political survival, distributive conflict). The latter considers the redistributive effect of distributive politics. Do these policies reflect the demand of the voters (mostly, the median voter) or rather particular groups, and do they maximize welfare? We will start with the clarification of classical concepts, such as core and swing voters, and theories of distributive politics (I). In section II we study income inequality and distributive conflicts that emerge from unequal distribution of wealth, finding out which incentives are at work at the individual level to either push for or against redistribution. We investigate micro theories on redistribution in democratic and non-democratic countries and tease out the important role of regime type. In section III we move on to distributive politics that are based on favoritism (political clientelism) and voter intimidation. Here, we study the effects of vote buying on political accountability and political participation with a particular focus on the case of Argentina and we investigate the redistributive effects of clientelistic resource allocation regarding electoral outcomes for the incumbent and the quality of democracy in general. Finally, we will delve into the new research field on voter intimidation (through violence and coercion) as an electoral strategy to influence voting behavior looking at field experiments for the case of Nigeria and the politician’s incentive for the case of electoral intimidation in Imperial Germany.

Preparatory Reading:
Przeworski, A., Stokes, S. and Manin, B. (1999) Democracy, Accountability and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Acemoglu, D. and J. Robinson (2005) The Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kitschelt, H. and Wilkinson, S. I. (2007) Patrons, Clients, and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Assignments and Credits:
6 CP: Term paper
3 CP: In-class presentation and written report of presentation topic

Die Veranstaltung dient als Einführung in die Gewerkschaftspolitik aus soziologischer und politikwissenschaftlicher Perspektive. Stand und Perspektiven der Gewerkschaftsbewegung im ausgehenden Sozialkapitalismus werden anhand relevanter Fachliteratur sowie empirischer Beispiele diskutiert.

Das Seminar ist als Einführung konzipiert. Es werden Grundlagen der wissenschaftlichen Beschäftigung mit den Politikfeldern Migration und Integration gelegt. Im ersten Teil wird es um Migrationstheorien sowie um die Strukturen der Migration weltweit, innerhalb der EU und nach Deutschland gehen. Die Rechtfertigung und Umsetzbarkeit von staatlichen Steuerungsansprüchen werden zudem im Fokus der Aufmerksamkeit stehen.

Im zweiten Teil werden zunächst die Konzepte von Integration, Assimilation und Multikulturalismus diskutiert. Des Weiteren geht es um Akteure der Integrationspolitik im Mehrebenensystem der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Die Themen „Migration und Stadt“ sowie „Migration und Sozialpolitik“ werden ebenfalls bearbeitet.

Prüfungsleistungen und CP/Assignments and Credits:
Die Veranstaltung ist Teil des Moduls M6-FdS im Master Sozialpolitik.
Für diese Lehrveranstaltung sind als Prüfungsleistungen vorgesehen: entweder eine
• Mittlere Prüfungsleistung (MPL) (3 CP) oder eine
• Große Prüfungsleistung (GPL) (6 CP).

Mittlere Prüfungsleistung

• Hausarbeit / Essay
• Klausur (90 Min.)

Große Prüfungsleistung (GPL)

• Hausarbeit
• Klausur (120 Min.)

This course critically explores how welfare states address, perpetuate, or deepen social inequalities, focusing on migration, gender, and labor market dynamics. Through interactive debates and case studies, students will analyze policies shaping access to resources, rights, and opportunities across different social groups. We will examine pressing issues such as the treatment of migrants in welfare systems, gendered labor market inequalities, and the future of social protections in a changing economy. Engaging with contemporary policy debates, students will assess how welfare states navigate tensions between inclusion, fairness, and economic sustainability. The course emphasizes active participation, encouraging students to develop advocacy strategies and critically engage with opposing perspectives. By the end, students will have a nuanced understanding of how welfare policies shape—and are shaped by—social inequalities.
Successful completion of the course requires active participation in all assigned components. For students aiming to receive 3 CP, this includes the completion of reading assignments, the research assignment, and participation in class debates. For those pursuing 6 CP, an additional requirement is the submission of an 8–10 page essay that explores a relevant issue in social policy with depth and originality.

In a first step, we discuss different texts on the variety of capitalist development in relation to welfare state development.
The second step is to highlight challenges of welfare capitalism as we know it.
Finally, we discuss some concepts on how to develop welfare state capitalism in the future.

preparatory literature:
Literature will be provided in Stud.IP

(CP) credits and exams:
You can achieve both 3 CP and 6 CP for the Master in Social Policy.
The seminar will be held as a block seminar on Fridays.

Ziel dieses Kurses ist es, eine grundlegende Einführung in die verhaltensorientierte Verwaltungswissenschaft zu geben und die Studierenden zu befähigen, diesen Erklärungsansatz auf aktuelle Problem- und Fragestellungen der öffentlichen Verwaltung und insbesondere der Arbeits- und Sozialverwaltung in Deutschland anzuwenden. Die verhaltensorientierte Verwaltungswissenschaft ist ein innovatives Forschungsfeld innerhalb der Verwaltungswissenschaft, das verhaltenswissenschaftliche Erkenntnisse zur Untersuchung des Verwaltungshandelns nutzt (eng. Behavioral Public Administration). Der Kurs gliedert sich in zwei Teile: Der erste Teil bietet eine Einführung in die grundlegenden Theorien bürokratischen Verhaltens. Dazu werden die Studierenden mit den Grundannahmen und wichtigsten Erkenntnissen der verschiedenen Mikrofundierungen administrativen Handelns vertraut gemacht. Im zweiten Teil des Kurses werden exemplarische Themen wie Leistungsmessung, Öffentlichkeit, Arbeitsmotivation, Koproduktion, Servicezufriedenheit, Serviceversagen, Diskriminierung und repräsentative Bürokratie aus der Perspektive der verhaltensorientierten Verwaltungswissenschaft analysiert, um die empirische Gültigkeit dieses Erklärungsrahmens zu überprüfen.

Literatur

Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Jilke, S., Olsen, A.L. and Tummers, L. (2017). Behavioral Public Administration: Combining Insights from Public Administration and Psychology. Public Administration Review, 77: 45-56.

Jankowski, M., Prokop, C. and Tepe, M. (2020). Representative Bureaucracy and Public Hiring Preferences. Evidence from a Conjoint Experiment among German Municipal Civil Servants and Private Sector Employees. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 30(4): 596–618.

James, O., Jilke, S., & Van Ryzin, G. (Eds.). (2017). Experiments in Public Management Research: Challenges and Contributions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wise, L. R. (2004). Bureaucratic Posture: On the Need for a Composite Theory of Bureaucratic Behavior. Public Administration Review, 64(6), 669–680.

Prüfungsleistungen und CP

6 CP: Diskussionsleitung (10 Min.), Präsentation eines Studiendesigns (10 Min.) und schriftliche Ausarbeitung des Studiendesigns in Form einer Pre-Registration/eines Pre-Analyseplans.

In a first step, we discuss different texts on the variety of capitalist development in relation to welfare state development.
The second step is to highlight challenges of welfare capitalism as we know it.
Finally, we discuss some concepts on how to develop welfare state capitalism in the future.

preparatory literature:
Literature will be provided in Stud.IP

(CP) credits and exams:
You can achieve both 3 CP and 6 CP for the Master in Social Policy.
The seminar will be held as a block seminar on Fridays.

Distributive politics characterize income redistribution and the allocation of public goods and services (e. g. health care, education, social security, but also particularistic goods) to individuals or groups and are based on taxes and transfers. Wealth and resources are unequally distributed in society. The question that distributive politics consequently address asks: who gets what, who benefits – who loses? Distributive politics illustrate the very heart of politics and a vibrant field of research which just gained new momentum in the last years. We will study principles of resource allocation from political actors (parties) to individuals (voters), considering the electoral payoff for political parties and voters. Which groups are targeted by political parties with public goods provision: core or swing voters, the rich or the poor, the median voter or particular groups (clients), the winning coalition or the selectorate? Do voters respond to non-programmatic inducements such as vote buying? When does income inequality lead to upheaval and regime change? We will start with the discussion of classical concepts and theories in comparative political economy before we move towards the analysis of current issues in this field of research in the course of the seminar.
Distributive politics refer to two central aspects in the political sphere: 1) political accountability and 2) political responsiveness. The first aspect studies how far voters are able to hold political actors accountable for their actions and, thus, takes into account the political consequences of distributive politics (e. g. political survival, distributive conflict). The latter considers the redistributive effect of distributive politics. Do these policies reflect the demand of the voters (mostly, the median voter) or rather particular groups, and do they maximize welfare? We will start with the clarification of classical concepts, such as core and swing voters, and theories of distributive politics (I). In section II we study income inequality and distributive conflicts that emerge from unequal distribution of wealth, finding out which incentives are at work at the individual level to either push for or against redistribution. We investigate micro theories on redistribution in democratic and non-democratic countries and tease out the important role of regime type. In section III we move on to distributive politics that are based on favoritism (political clientelism) and voter intimidation. Here, we study the effects of vote buying on political accountability and political participation with a particular focus on the case of Argentina and we investigate the redistributive effects of clientelistic resource allocation regarding electoral outcomes for the incumbent and the quality of democracy in general. Finally, we will delve into the new research field on voter intimidation (through violence and coercion) as an electoral strategy to influence voting behavior looking at field experiments for the case of Nigeria and the politician’s incentive for the case of electoral intimidation in Imperial Germany.

Preparatory Reading:
Przeworski, A., Stokes, S. and Manin, B. (1999) Democracy, Accountability and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Acemoglu, D. and J. Robinson (2005) The Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kitschelt, H. and Wilkinson, S. I. (2007) Patrons, Clients, and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Assignments and Credits:
6 CP: Term paper
3 CP: In-class presentation and written report of presentation topic

Die Veranstaltung dient als Einführung in die Gewerkschaftspolitik aus soziologischer und politikwissenschaftlicher Perspektive. Stand und Perspektiven der Gewerkschaftsbewegung im ausgehenden Sozialkapitalismus werden anhand relevanter Fachliteratur sowie empirischer Beispiele diskutiert.

Das Seminar ist als Einführung konzipiert. Es werden Grundlagen der wissenschaftlichen Beschäftigung mit den Politikfeldern Migration und Integration gelegt. Im ersten Teil wird es um Migrationstheorien sowie um die Strukturen der Migration weltweit, innerhalb der EU und nach Deutschland gehen. Die Rechtfertigung und Umsetzbarkeit von staatlichen Steuerungsansprüchen werden zudem im Fokus der Aufmerksamkeit stehen.

Im zweiten Teil werden zunächst die Konzepte von Integration, Assimilation und Multikulturalismus diskutiert. Des Weiteren geht es um Akteure der Integrationspolitik im Mehrebenensystem der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Die Themen „Migration und Stadt“ sowie „Migration und Sozialpolitik“ werden ebenfalls bearbeitet.

Prüfungsleistungen und CP/Assignments and Credits:
Die Veranstaltung ist Teil des Moduls M6-FdS im Master Sozialpolitik.
Für diese Lehrveranstaltung sind als Prüfungsleistungen vorgesehen: entweder eine
• Mittlere Prüfungsleistung (MPL) (3 CP) oder eine
• Große Prüfungsleistung (GPL) (6 CP).

Mittlere Prüfungsleistung

• Hausarbeit / Essay
• Klausur (90 Min.)

Große Prüfungsleistung (GPL)

• Hausarbeit
• Klausur (120 Min.)

This course critically explores how welfare states address, perpetuate, or deepen social inequalities, focusing on migration, gender, and labor market dynamics. Through interactive debates and case studies, students will analyze policies shaping access to resources, rights, and opportunities across different social groups. We will examine pressing issues such as the treatment of migrants in welfare systems, gendered labor market inequalities, and the future of social protections in a changing economy. Engaging with contemporary policy debates, students will assess how welfare states navigate tensions between inclusion, fairness, and economic sustainability. The course emphasizes active participation, encouraging students to develop advocacy strategies and critically engage with opposing perspectives. By the end, students will have a nuanced understanding of how welfare policies shape—and are shaped by—social inequalities.
Successful completion of the course requires active participation in all assigned components. For students aiming to receive 3 CP, this includes the completion of reading assignments, the research assignment, and participation in class debates. For those pursuing 6 CP, an additional requirement is the submission of an 8–10 page essay that explores a relevant issue in social policy with depth and originality.

In a first step, we discuss different texts on the variety of capitalist development in relation to welfare state development.
The second step is to highlight challenges of welfare capitalism as we know it.
Finally, we discuss some concepts on how to develop welfare state capitalism in the future.

preparatory literature:
Literature will be provided in Stud.IP

(CP) credits and exams:
You can achieve both 3 CP and 6 CP for the Master in Social Policy.
The seminar will be held as a block seminar on Fridays.

Ziel dieses Kurses ist es, eine grundlegende Einführung in die verhaltensorientierte Verwaltungswissenschaft zu geben und die Studierenden zu befähigen, diesen Erklärungsansatz auf aktuelle Problem- und Fragestellungen der öffentlichen Verwaltung und insbesondere der Arbeits- und Sozialverwaltung in Deutschland anzuwenden. Die verhaltensorientierte Verwaltungswissenschaft ist ein innovatives Forschungsfeld innerhalb der Verwaltungswissenschaft, das verhaltenswissenschaftliche Erkenntnisse zur Untersuchung des Verwaltungshandelns nutzt (eng. Behavioral Public Administration). Der Kurs gliedert sich in zwei Teile: Der erste Teil bietet eine Einführung in die grundlegenden Theorien bürokratischen Verhaltens. Dazu werden die Studierenden mit den Grundannahmen und wichtigsten Erkenntnissen der verschiedenen Mikrofundierungen administrativen Handelns vertraut gemacht. Im zweiten Teil des Kurses werden exemplarische Themen wie Leistungsmessung, Öffentlichkeit, Arbeitsmotivation, Koproduktion, Servicezufriedenheit, Serviceversagen, Diskriminierung und repräsentative Bürokratie aus der Perspektive der verhaltensorientierten Verwaltungswissenschaft analysiert, um die empirische Gültigkeit dieses Erklärungsrahmens zu überprüfen.

Literatur

Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Jilke, S., Olsen, A.L. and Tummers, L. (2017). Behavioral Public Administration: Combining Insights from Public Administration and Psychology. Public Administration Review, 77: 45-56.

Jankowski, M., Prokop, C. and Tepe, M. (2020). Representative Bureaucracy and Public Hiring Preferences. Evidence from a Conjoint Experiment among German Municipal Civil Servants and Private Sector Employees. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 30(4): 596–618.

James, O., Jilke, S., & Van Ryzin, G. (Eds.). (2017). Experiments in Public Management Research: Challenges and Contributions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wise, L. R. (2004). Bureaucratic Posture: On the Need for a Composite Theory of Bureaucratic Behavior. Public Administration Review, 64(6), 669–680.

Prüfungsleistungen und CP

6 CP: Diskussionsleitung (10 Min.), Präsentation eines Studiendesigns (10 Min.) und schriftliche Ausarbeitung des Studiendesigns in Form einer Pre-Registration/eines Pre-Analyseplans.

In a first step, we discuss different texts on the variety of capitalist development in relation to welfare state development.
The second step is to highlight challenges of welfare capitalism as we know it.
Finally, we discuss some concepts on how to develop welfare state capitalism in the future.

preparatory literature:
Literature will be provided in Stud.IP

(CP) credits and exams:
You can achieve both 3 CP and 6 CP for the Master in Social Policy.
The seminar will be held as a block seminar on Fridays.

Distributive politics characterize income redistribution and the allocation of public goods and services (e. g. health care, education, social security, but also particularistic goods) to individuals or groups and are based on taxes and transfers. Wealth and resources are unequally distributed in society. The question that distributive politics consequently address asks: who gets what, who benefits – who loses? Distributive politics illustrate the very heart of politics and a vibrant field of research which just gained new momentum in the last years. We will study principles of resource allocation from political actors (parties) to individuals (voters), considering the electoral payoff for political parties and voters. Which groups are targeted by political parties with public goods provision: core or swing voters, the rich or the poor, the median voter or particular groups (clients), the winning coalition or the selectorate? Do voters respond to non-programmatic inducements such as vote buying? When does income inequality lead to upheaval and regime change? We will start with the discussion of classical concepts and theories in comparative political economy before we move towards the analysis of current issues in this field of research in the course of the seminar.
Distributive politics refer to two central aspects in the political sphere: 1) political accountability and 2) political responsiveness. The first aspect studies how far voters are able to hold political actors accountable for their actions and, thus, takes into account the political consequences of distributive politics (e. g. political survival, distributive conflict). The latter considers the redistributive effect of distributive politics. Do these policies reflect the demand of the voters (mostly, the median voter) or rather particular groups, and do they maximize welfare? We will start with the clarification of classical concepts, such as core and swing voters, and theories of distributive politics (I). In section II we study income inequality and distributive conflicts that emerge from unequal distribution of wealth, finding out which incentives are at work at the individual level to either push for or against redistribution. We investigate micro theories on redistribution in democratic and non-democratic countries and tease out the important role of regime type. In section III we move on to distributive politics that are based on favoritism (political clientelism) and voter intimidation. Here, we study the effects of vote buying on political accountability and political participation with a particular focus on the case of Argentina and we investigate the redistributive effects of clientelistic resource allocation regarding electoral outcomes for the incumbent and the quality of democracy in general. Finally, we will delve into the new research field on voter intimidation (through violence and coercion) as an electoral strategy to influence voting behavior looking at field experiments for the case of Nigeria and the politician’s incentive for the case of electoral intimidation in Imperial Germany.

Preparatory Reading:
Przeworski, A., Stokes, S. and Manin, B. (1999) Democracy, Accountability and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Acemoglu, D. and J. Robinson (2005) The Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kitschelt, H. and Wilkinson, S. I. (2007) Patrons, Clients, and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Assignments and Credits:
6 CP: Term paper
3 CP: In-class presentation and written report of presentation topic

Die Veranstaltung dient als Einführung in die Gewerkschaftspolitik aus soziologischer und politikwissenschaftlicher Perspektive. Stand und Perspektiven der Gewerkschaftsbewegung im ausgehenden Sozialkapitalismus werden anhand relevanter Fachliteratur sowie empirischer Beispiele diskutiert.

Das Seminar ist als Einführung konzipiert. Es werden Grundlagen der wissenschaftlichen Beschäftigung mit den Politikfeldern Migration und Integration gelegt. Im ersten Teil wird es um Migrationstheorien sowie um die Strukturen der Migration weltweit, innerhalb der EU und nach Deutschland gehen. Die Rechtfertigung und Umsetzbarkeit von staatlichen Steuerungsansprüchen werden zudem im Fokus der Aufmerksamkeit stehen.

Im zweiten Teil werden zunächst die Konzepte von Integration, Assimilation und Multikulturalismus diskutiert. Des Weiteren geht es um Akteure der Integrationspolitik im Mehrebenensystem der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Die Themen „Migration und Stadt“ sowie „Migration und Sozialpolitik“ werden ebenfalls bearbeitet.

Prüfungsleistungen und CP/Assignments and Credits:
Die Veranstaltung ist Teil des Moduls M6-FdS im Master Sozialpolitik.
Für diese Lehrveranstaltung sind als Prüfungsleistungen vorgesehen: entweder eine
• Mittlere Prüfungsleistung (MPL) (3 CP) oder eine
• Große Prüfungsleistung (GPL) (6 CP).

Mittlere Prüfungsleistung

• Hausarbeit / Essay
• Klausur (90 Min.)

Große Prüfungsleistung (GPL)

• Hausarbeit
• Klausur (120 Min.)

This course critically explores how welfare states address, perpetuate, or deepen social inequalities, focusing on migration, gender, and labor market dynamics. Through interactive debates and case studies, students will analyze policies shaping access to resources, rights, and opportunities across different social groups. We will examine pressing issues such as the treatment of migrants in welfare systems, gendered labor market inequalities, and the future of social protections in a changing economy. Engaging with contemporary policy debates, students will assess how welfare states navigate tensions between inclusion, fairness, and economic sustainability. The course emphasizes active participation, encouraging students to develop advocacy strategies and critically engage with opposing perspectives. By the end, students will have a nuanced understanding of how welfare policies shape—and are shaped by—social inequalities.
Successful completion of the course requires active participation in all assigned components. For students aiming to receive 3 CP, this includes the completion of reading assignments, the research assignment, and participation in class debates. For those pursuing 6 CP, an additional requirement is the submission of an 8–10 page essay that explores a relevant issue in social policy with depth and originality.

In a first step, we discuss different texts on the variety of capitalist development in relation to welfare state development.
The second step is to highlight challenges of welfare capitalism as we know it.
Finally, we discuss some concepts on how to develop welfare state capitalism in the future.

preparatory literature:
Literature will be provided in Stud.IP

(CP) credits and exams:
You can achieve both 3 CP and 6 CP for the Master in Social Policy.
The seminar will be held as a block seminar on Fridays.