Zum Hauptinhalt springen



in press/online first

  • Laybourn, S., Frenzel, A.C., Constant, M., & Liesefeld, H.R. (in press). Unintended emotions in the laboratory: Emotions incidentally induced by a standard visual working memory task predict task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.
  • Liesefeld, H.R., & Janczyk, M. (accepted/in press). Same same but different: Subtle but consequential differences between two measures to linearly integrate speed and accuracy (LISAS vs. BIS). Behavior Research Methods.
  • Liesefeld, H.R.*, Liesefeld, A.M.*, & Müller, H.J. (2021). Preparatory control against distraction is not feature-based. Cerebral Cortex.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhab341 (*shared first authorship)


  • Arend, J.M., Liesefeld, H.R., & Pörschmann, C. (2021). On the contribution of binaural cues to auditory distance estimation of nearby sound sources. Acta Acustica, 5, 10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2021001
  • Arend, J. M., Ramírez, M., Liesefeld, H. R., & Pӧrschmann, C. (2021). Do near-field cues enhance the plausibility of non-individual binaural rendering in a dynamic multimodal virtual acoustic scene? Acta Acustica, 5, 55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2021048
  • Chen, S., Kocsis, A., Liesefeld, H.R., Müller, H.J., & Conci, M. (2021). Object-based grouping benefits without integrated feature representations in visual working memory. Attention Perception, & Psychophysics,83, 1357-1374. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02153-5
  • Dodwell, G., Liesefeld, H.R., Conci, M., Müller, H.J., & Töllner, T. (2021). EEG evidence for enhanced attentional performance during moderate-intensity exercise. Psychophysiology, 58, e13923. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13923
  • Constant, M., & Liesefeld, H.R. (2021). Massive effects of saliency on information processing in visual working memory. Psychological Science, 32, 682-691. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797620975785 [preprint]
  • Liesefeld, H.R., Liesefeld, A.M., & Müller, H.J. (2021). Attentional capture: an ameliorable side-effect of searching for salient targets. Visual Cognition, 29, 600-603.  http:/dx.doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2021.1925798
  • Liesefeld, H.R., & Müller, H.J. (2021). Modulations of saliency signals at two hierarchical levels of priority computation revealed by spatial statistical distractor learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150, 710-728.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xge0000970
  • Pavlov, Y.G., Adamian, N., Appelhoff, S., Arvaneh, M., Benwell, C., Beste, C., … Liesefeld, H.R., … Mushtaq, F. (2021). #EEGManyLabs: Investigating the replicability of influential EEG experiments. Cortex, 144, 213-229.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2021.03.013 [preprint]
  • Sauter, M., Hanning, N.M., Liesefeld, H.R., & Müller, H.J. (2021). Statistical learning of frequent distractor locations in visual search: A role for post-selective distractor rejection processes? Cortex, 135, 108-126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2020.11.016 [preprint]
  • Souza, A.S., Thaler, T., Liesefeld, H.R., Santos, F.H., Peixoto, D.S., & Albuquerque, P.D. (2021). No evidence that self-rated negative emotion boosts visual working memory precision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,47, 282-307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000891






2015 and before

  • Zimmer, H.D., & Liesefeld, H.R. (2011). Spatial information in (visual) working memory. In A. Vandierendonck & A. Szmalec (Eds.), Spatial working memory (pp. 46-66). Hove, England: Psychology Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315793252
Aktualisiert von: Julia Unger